Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532
Webb30 juni 2024 · State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Legal Maxim Home Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Facts A, the owner of a forest, executed an unregistered … Webb3 mars 2024 · In the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property.
Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532
Did you know?
WebbSmt. Shantabai v/s State of Bombay and Others Petition No. 104 of 1957 Decided On, 24 March 1958 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE S. R. DASS (CJI) By, … Webbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he executed an unregistered document, that called itself a lease, in favour of his wife, the petitioner. The deed gives her the right to enter upon certain areas in the zamindari in order to cut and take out
Webb16 sep. 2016 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532) determining whether the tree is movable or immovable, the intention of the party is important if the parties intend that the tree should continue to have the benefit of further nutriment to be afforded by soil, the tree is immovable property. Webb21 juli 2000 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 and the fact that the applicant...Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532. According to him, the present case is one of profits a prendre. The …
WebbSave Save Shantabai vs State of Bombay For Later. 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 72 views 7 pages. Shantabai Vs State of Bombay. Original Title: ... 1959 SCR 265 : AIR 1958 SC 532. In the Supreme Court of India (BEFORE SUDHI RANJAN DAS, C.J. AND T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR, SUDHANSHU KUMAR DAS, A.K. SARKAR AND … WebbSHANTABAI V. STATE OF BOMBAY Movable & Immovable Property Transfer of Property act By Bhawna Hey everyone, i am Bhawna Vishwakarma and welcome to Bhawn...
Webb14 juni 2024 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532, 536, 537: 1959 SCR 265. The definition of immovable property in Section 3 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is couched in negative form in that it does not include standing timber, growing crops or grass.
WebbComments on: Shantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 grafana and active directoryWebbIn the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property. grafana allow unsigned pluginsWebb16 juli 2024 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Headnote Petn. No. 104 of 1957 decided on … grafana and microsoftWebbShantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 ISSUE: Is a tree an immovable property and what is the distinction between the tree and standing timber? What is the distinction … grafana annotations not showingWebb16 nov. 2015 · Shantabai v. State of Bombay[ii] FACTS: Shantabai’s husband had granted her the right to take and appropriate all kinds of wood from certain forests in his Zamindary through an unregistered document. china bank deposit accountWebbState of Bombay & Ors [1958] INSC 25 (24 March 1958) Shrimati Shantabai Vs. State of Bombay & Ors [1958] INSC 25 (24 March 1958) 1958 Latest Caselaw 25 SC. Section 105. TPA, Lease defined. By an unregistered document the husband of the petitioner granted her the right to take and appropriate all kinds of wood from certain forests in his Zamindary. grafana and servicenowWebbSMT. Shantabai vs state of Bombay (AIR 1958 SC 532) The court held that right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. Facts: By an unregistered document the husband of the petitioner granted her chinabank divisoria contact number